| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6045 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Amar Singh Sharma vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506926]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
Shree Sainath Wires (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs PEC Ltd. and Ors.
Validity of conviction-Section 138 & Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Fine as compensation.-Court below while awarding sentence and fine as compensation under Section 357(3) of Cr.P.C. could have increased fine amount twice cheque amount unde [LexDoc Id : 506910]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Dhirender Kumar vs Sanjiv Kumar
Decreed of suit-Order XXXVII of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Procedural formalities.-Courts below decreed suit in favour of respondent/plaintiff. Whether, Courts below was justified in decreed suit in favour of respondent/plaintiff. He [LexDoc Id : 506907]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Vanguard Jewels Ltd. vs DCIT
Disallowance of expenses-Dividend income-Whether, disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and (iii) of Rule rightly calculated by AO. Held, it is seen that AO noticed that assessee had earned divid [LexDoc Id : 506735]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
ITO vs Shiv Sarjan Developers
Deletion of disallowance-Comparable data-Whether, CIT(A) was justified in deleting disallowance made by AO. Held, disallowance of 50% made by AO not based on comparable data or justification [LexDoc Id : 506732]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Raj Metal Co. vs ITO
Validity of reassessment-Section 143(3) and Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction.-Whether, in facts and circumstances of case AO was justified in issued notice for reassessment proceedings. Held, original assessment was completed un [LexDoc Id : 506731]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Pravav Securities (P) Ltd.
Deletion of addition-Section 55(2)(ab) of Finance Act, 2001. Indexation benefit.-Whether, CIT(A) rightly directed AO to allow indexation benefit from AY 1998-99 and not from AY 2005-06 in spite of fact that shares of BSE were acqui [LexDoc Id : 506730]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Mahasagar Travels Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506729]
|
ITAT (Rajkot) |
2016 |
ACIT vs H.B. Estate Developers (P) Ltd.
H.B. Estate Developers (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506728]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
ITO vs Bawa Developers (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506726]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Axtel Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506707]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Amit Keshan vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 506706]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Glaxosmithline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs ACIT
Disallowance-Section 14A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Proportionate interest.-Whether, disallowance of proportionate interest under Section 14A of Act rightly made. Held, regarding disallowance of proportionate interest under Se [LexDoc Id : 506705]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Prabhakar T. Bhandary
Prabhakar T. Bhandary vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 535804]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Pinaki D. Panani
Pinaki D. Panani vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 535802]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
CIT vs C. Subba Reddy
Deemed Dividend-Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Business transactions.-Whether on facts and circumstances of case, Tribunal was right in holding that provisions of Section 2(22)(e) treating a loan or advance as deemed div [LexDoc Id : 507240]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Bharti Airtel Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of Show Cause Notice-Period of Limitation-Second respondent issued several impugned Show Cause Notices, in order to deem petitioner as an "assessee in default". Whether, impugned Show Cause No [LexDoc Id : 507239]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Hindustan Gum and Chemicals Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506843]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Cutting Edge Technologies vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 525056]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2016 |
Unicolour Chemicals Co. vs Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department
[LexDoc Id : 507114]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Transmission Corpn. of AP Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506847]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
ITO vs Priyanka Transport
[LexDoc Id : 506846]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Association of Physicians of Hyderabad Trust vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 506842]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
CIT and Anr. vs Yokogawa India Ltd.
Mechanism of total income-Purview of computation-Whether, Section 10A of Act is beyond purview of computation mechanism of total income as defined under Act. Held, if specific provisions of Act provi [LexDoc Id : 506617]
|
SC |
2016 |
Tata Sons Ltd. vs Ram Niwas and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Deceptive similarity-Plaintiff sought decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants from directly or indirectly dealing in business of providing transport; packagi [LexDoc Id : 507151]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
